Muscat International Airport MC3 awarded for RO 706 Million

Finally, after a Tender process of nearly 2 entire years, today the Tender board awarded the airport building contract (MC3) for RO 706 Million to the Contractor Bechtel. So here's a new logo to get used to seeing when driving past the airport:
What is strange about the award is that Bechtel were the most expensive of the three final Tenderers for the MC3 package, behind consortium's lead by CCC and J&P.

Now, I happen to currently be reading a book called "Confessions of an economic hitman" in which Bechtel are specifically being named as being a favoured Contractor with the US AID and similar aid organizations. Well worth a read if you have the time! Funnily enough, click here to see Bechtel's work in Iraq - the Client..... USAID!

Timing is a funny thing, sometimes. I wonder why Bechtel were awarded the job, when they were the highest of the three final tenderers? Technical expertise?

le fin.
Muscat International Airport MC3 awarded for RO 706 Million Muscat International Airport MC3 awarded for RO 706 Million Reviewed by Sythe on Monday, October 25, 2010 Rating: 5

27 comments:

  1. It's not only Bechtel; its a Bechtel, Enka, BEC Joint Venture

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hopefully a realization that cheapest often turns out to be 100% loss here – and Bahwans did win the original airport management contract with BAA – so they seem to have what it takes to win tenders there and Bechtel did work in Sohar Aluminium which was finished to plan

    ReplyDelete
  3. One sentence book review: Confessions of an economic hitman read like a bad airport lounge pickup line.

    Great post, thank god they finally got it tendered.

    Unrelated: Still aware that we owe you money. Will sort that ASAP. Love you guys to death. Miss you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We all know that everything costs double in Oman compare to else where including roads and towns. Example Khuwair 33 cost a much Shatti to build but look at the difference. Even the tender for aircrafts cost more than other countries paid for same. Yeah it makes you wonder. By the way there were more tenders for this airport from different people and different countries - question why always the elite few in Muscat manage to win these tenders.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very wierd.

    I thought that given all 3 companies vying for the project are very experienced and equally matched, generally speaking, that the project would be awarded based on the only difference that being pricing.

    Very interesting and surely there is much more to this story.

    ReplyDelete
  6. graft on an epic scale in Oman, but such is life..

    ReplyDelete
  7. One of the longest/tiring project i am working with for my entire carrer....Hope the project will go well and hope we will bag the facade works..

    ReplyDelete
  8. it is absolutely miracle,
    how the porject has been awarded to the most expensive tenderer, while the other very experienced companies have remaining there, very strange.......

    Personally i think Ultimately it will go to J&P

    ReplyDelete
  9. Strange that Bechtel's winning tender was not that far from J&P's price for the original design and of course J&P's new price is much lower than Bechtel's. The money saved could be used elsewhere one would have thought.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very strange..ther might be another story behind the wal...

    ReplyDelete
  11. The Bechtel winning tender was considerably more than CCC or J&P. It wasn't even close.

    Just when the world is tightening budgets and looking to save money a contract of this size is awarded to the highest bidder is a true head scratcher.

    There must be another story behind the story. And, my guess is we will never know.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It seems quite wrong because the reason it went for re-tendering was that the bids they got were too high so why all of a sudden is money no object?

    ReplyDelete
  13. It is not about money. It is about politics.

    If Oman saw how Bechtel has been failing the new airport in Qatar, they should have not even short-listed them.

    Also they have been kicked out from Dubai Airport Project after finishing T1.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good Luck to Tender Board Committee and Bechtel..Hope the project will go well..

    ReplyDelete
  15. Maybe part of a deal with the US, we pay & build new miltary airports (Mussanah) you give work to our highly placed companies..?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ye i agree, Mrs Clinton was in Oman recently...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Congrats to your new terminal to be opened in 2020!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Lot's of comments here, and lots of theories. To the anonymous poster that said "There must be another story behind the story. And, my guess is we will never know." - I think you are right.

    It certainly does raise concern when the tender price was so much higher than the other two prices tendered, but I'm sure there must be some valid reasons why they were successful.

    Thank you all for commenting on this, please carry on if you have something to say!

    ReplyDelete
  19. i do agree with few of ur comments on tender being awarded to the highest bidder which ofcourse is not fair. However, in such large scale projects one has to see the reputation of the local consortium partner whcih is very important.their past and recent performance is also taken into consideration. bahwan already working in muscat airport could have given them an extra point. no doubt bechtel has used the Political power.

    recently one of the power project(sohar interconnection station) was awarded to Larsen & Toubro though Bahwan were the lowest bidder. tender board had a justifying reason for that; which would ultimately result in keeping the said project viable to them. ppl involved will understand this better. take care.regrds

    ReplyDelete
  20. I feel very sorry for the other two bidders J&P and CCC. This saga has gone on for 2 years. Think of all those wasted man hours and resources. I know that the lowest bidder is not guaranteed to get the job, but when the difference in the bids for the terminal building was so huge, one has to wonder.

    ReplyDelete
  21. wiki: True that BEC was the highest bidder but what was considered more then price was the specification about the work. So they choosed the highest quality and also the highest price.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So much jealousy! BEC are the best suited for this project so get over it and find another project to tender on. BEC comprise the most experienced design team for this type of work compared to the other bidders.

    ReplyDelete
  23. BEC now screwing up vendors to meet their budgets ,,,also considering bringing dubai based vendors .... how Omani companies will sustain and how companies will create jobs if they dont get to work with such large scale projects .... and strangely consultants also say NO to oman products . no one is taking action against such unprofessional .

    ReplyDelete
  24. Its strange .... why MOTC is keeping quiet ...if such things are happening !

    ReplyDelete
  25. why is it strange - it is consistent

    ReplyDelete
  26. re: Omani products.
    We shall install approximately 140.000 m2 of Omani Desert Rose Stone cladding in this project which makes about %37 of total Stone work. The rest is mostly granite for which an alternate from Oman is not available.
    So producers of Desert Rose are gonna be quite busy next year.

    ReplyDelete

This is a free blog hosted in the USA, comments are not moderated and should be treated as individual observations made by the commenter, they are not the views of the author of this blog unless specifically noted as such (eg a comment posted under the account of the blog owner). Should an individual or company wish a specific comment(s) removed please contact me at mrsythe[at]gmail[dot]com and inform me and I will delete it as soon as I read the email.

Powered by Blogger.